Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry.

نویسندگان

  • Duk-Woo Park
  • Ki Bae Seung
  • Young-Hak Kim
  • Jong-Young Lee
  • Won-Jang Kim
  • Soo-Jin Kang
  • Seung-Whan Lee
  • Cheol Whan Lee
  • Seong-Wook Park
  • Sung-Cheol Yun
  • Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
  • Myung-Ho Jeong
  • Yang-Soo Jang
  • Hyo-Soo Kim
  • Pum Joon Kim
  • In-Whan Seong
  • Hun Sik Park
  • Taehoon Ahn
  • In-Ho Chae
  • Seung-Jea Tahk
  • Wook-Sung Chung
  • Seung-Jung Park
چکیده

OBJECTIVES We performed the long-term follow-up of a large cohort of patients in a multicenter study receiving left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization. BACKGROUND Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent coronary stent procedure or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS We evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who received coronary stents (n = 1,102; 318 with bare-metal stents and 784 with drug-eluting stents) or underwent CABG (n = 1,138) between 2000 and 2006 and for whom complete follow-up data were available for at least 3 to 9 years (median 5.2 years). The 5-year adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke; and target vessel revascularization [TVR]) were compared with the use of the inverse probability of treatment weighted method and propensity-score matching. RESULTS After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors with the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.44, p = 0.35) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.37, p = 0.59) were not significantly different for patients undergoing stenting versus CABG. The risk of TVR was significantly higher in the stenting group than in the CABG group (HR: 5.11; 95% CI: 3.52 to 7.42, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in comparisons of bare-metal stent with concurrent CABG and of drug-eluting stent with concurrent CABG. In further analysis with propensity-score matching, overall findings were consistent. CONCLUSIONS During 5-year follow-up, stenting showed similar rates of mortality and of the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke but higher rates of TVR as compared with CABG for patients with unprotected LMCA disease.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Acute and Long Term Outcomes of Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Introduction : Significant left main coronary artery stenosis jeopardizes the entire myocardium of the left ventricle and has the worst prognosis of any form of coronary artery disease. Coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been considered as the standard therapeutic approach for such patients. There are limited data on the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PC...

متن کامل

How to optimize left main percutaneous coronary intervention.

Despite unfavorable outcomes in the early era of LMCA percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), interventionalists have continued attempting percutaneous treatment for LMCA stenosis (3). Technical advances in PCI and stent technology, particularly with the widespread availability of drug-eluting stents (DES), have led physicians to re-evaluate the role of PCI as a viable alternative treatment f...

متن کامل

Impact of the extent of coronary artery disease on outcomes after revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVES This study was designed to examine the impact of the extent of coronary disease on long-term outcomes after coronary stenting or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis. BACKGROUND The differential outcome of ULMCA revascularization according to the coronary involvement remains uncertain. METHODS From the MAIN-COMPARE...

متن کامل

Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel and unprotected left main coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention using second-generation drug-eluting stents with those of coronary artery bypass grafting among patients with multivessel disease and/or unprotected left main coronary artery disease in terms of mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and angina. BACKGROUND Although coronary artery disease ...

متن کامل

Revascularization for unprotected left main stem coronary artery stenosis stenting or surgery.

For coronary artery disease with unprotected left main stem (LMS) stenosis, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is traditionally regarded as the "standard of care" because of its well-documented and durable survival advantage. There is now an increasing trend to use drug-eluting stents for LMS stenosis rather than CABG despite very little high-quality data to inform clinical practice. We her...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

دوره 56 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010